A recent call to action and blog by the Safe Routes to School National Partnerships highlights the fact that risk of losing 20 years of progress on bicycle and pedestrian safety in exchange for a 15-month transportation bill.  They have urged  everyone who cares about Safe Routes to School to let their Members of Congress know how you feel. Read on below:

SRTS Call to ActionThe state of play on the transportation bill seems to change daily, if not hourly, here in Washington, DC.  Last week, negotiations between the House and Senate broke down and it seemed that a transportation extension was likely.But, yesterday evening, Speaker Boehner (R-OH), Leader Reid (D-NV), Rep. Mica (R-FL) and Sen. Boxer (D-CA) met to assess what was possible.  They left the meeting declaring a “redoubling” of efforts to try and reach agreement.  Today, Sen. Boxer and Rep. Mica are reportedly meeting for hours to try and hammer out agreement.  The clock is ticking as the current extension expires June 30, 2012.Several press stories have reported that House Republicans have indicated they would be willing to back down on non-transportation environmental provisions, such as requiring approval of the Keystone pipeline, in exchange for “reasonable agreements” in three transportation policy areas:

  • Transportation Enhancements (the House’s shorthand for all bicycling and walking funding)
  • Program consolidation
  • “Streamlining” of environmental regulations

This puts a lot of pressure on Sen. Boxer to make further concessions on bicycling and walking funding—even though the Senate bill already contains significant compromise with the Cardin-Cochran agreement.  We know that House Republicans continue to insist on making all funding for bicycling and walking optional—putting decisions about whether communities get any of this money in the hands of the state department of transportation.  We also know that House Republicans are attempting to strip Safe Routes to School even as an eligibility for funding.

We are very concerned about these continued negotiations as they could put at risk 20 years of progress on bicycle and pedestrian safety in exchange for a 15-month transportation bill.  We urge everyone who cares about Safe Routes to School to let your Members of Congress know how you feel.  We have several ways to do so—and time is of the essence, so call or email today!

Thank you so much for your dedication to Safe Routes to School!

See the full post at: http://www.saferoutespartnership.org/node/908/

BB FLYER_5x7_front copy

Better Block Fort Lauderdale hosted a one-day event on June 16, 2012 that illustrated how ordinary streets can be transformed into great public spaces. The Better Block event was  located in FATVillage Arts District, on the 500 Block of NW 1st Avenue. Through this event, Fort Lauderdale joined other cities including Dallas, Oklahoma City, and Philadelphia in using tactical urbanism and volunteer support to revitalize a city block. See below for pictures from the event.

For more information, or to follow/share it:
https://www.facebook.com/BetterBlockFtL
http://betterblock.org/?p=858

The National Complete Streets Coalition recently shared research by Dr. Eric Dumbaugh on the streets with a lower speed limits are safer for all modes of transportation; read below for more information. Dr. Dumbaugh is also a member of the Technical Advisory Committee for the Broward Complete Streets Initiative.

National Complete Streets Coalition ArticleA new piece of research from Eric Dumbaugh caught my eye — it finds that major arterials and areas with big-box stores are associated with a higher incidence of serious traffic crashes among older adults. The research suggests that a denser network of lower speed streets is safer for older adults, whether driving, walking, or riding a bicycle. Of course, this is not a huge surprise; as discussed in the AARP report Planning Complete Streets for an Aging America, older drivers fare better when speeds are lower and way finding is clear.The newest research builds on earlier work by Dumbaugh (here is one recent paper), in which he finds that the streets that are safest for pedestrians were also safest for drivers.This is a fundamental point for the Complete Streets movement to seize. As it grows and spreads, I’ve seen the movement described as primarily, or even exclusively, benefitting bicycles and pedestrians. This is a natural tendency, given just how desperately pedestrians and bicycles need safer streets. Yet to let it become a shorthand for bicycle and pedestrian facilities is to lose much of its power to upend our silo-based transportation planning system, in which each mode is treated as if it is a separate entity.

In fact, Complete Streets clarifies that streets are used by people riding buses and bikes, walking, and driving automobiles. Those people are young and old, slow and fast, with and without disabilities. Complete Streets policies are intended to ensure that transportation practitioners take all of that complexity into account in creating safer streets.

That complexity includes the surrounding land use — and the work of researchers like Dumbaugh should help transportation practitioners break out of another silo and make the case that their safety mission gives them some say over land-use decisions.

I’m told by Stefanie Seskin that we’ve recently crossed the 400-mark for Complete Streets policies at the state and local level. If we are successful, those policies will result in more than just a few bike lanes and sidewalks — they will encourage transportation agencies to discard the silos and take a holistic approach that creates roads that save lives while building better communities.

To read more, click here: http://www.completestreets.org/resources/taking-the-silos-out-of-transportation-safety/

A recent article from GOVERNING highlights the obesity epidemic and how cities with more individuals who walk and bike to work have lower obesity. Cities with infrastructure for walking and biking promote more physical activity which in turn can help improve health. To learn about the Broward Complete Streets Initiative which is working to improve the environment for all modes of transportation, click here.

GOVERNING Article

The latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention affirms an alarming trend: we’re fat and not getting any slimmer. An estimated 35 percent of U.S. adults are obese, and another third still maintain weights exceeding those deemed healthy. This doesn’t bode well for governments and individuals paying insurance premiums, especially with the country’s aging population.

But there are antidotes to the problem, and among the best could be sidewalks and bike lanes. The infrastructure not only facilitates outdoor recreation and an alternative to congested roadways, but data shows it delivers slimmer waistlines in some of the nation’s largest metropolitan regions.

A Governing review of census and CDC data finds communities where more residents walk or bike to work boast significantly healthier weights. The analysis of 2010 statistics for 126 metropolitan areas finds these communities are strongly correlated with higher numbers of residents who are neither obese nor overweight.

Historically, studies have linked trails, sidewalks and bike lanes with an increase in walking or cycling. As medical costs continue to rise and evidence mounts that such infrastructure also improves well-being, more officials might look to give health consideration greater standing in transportation planning.

“The more access that people have to these kinds of places, the more likely they are to be healthy,” said Susan Polan, associate executive director for public affairs and advocacy with the American Public Health Association.

Metropolitan regions with the healthiest weights are home to high counts of walkers and bike commuters.

The CDC considers those with sizable weights for their height (body mass index of 30 or greater) to be obese, and others who are not quite obese, but exceeding healthy weights, to be “overweight.”

Approximately half of Fort Collins-Loveland, Colo., metro area residents are neither overweight nor obese. That might not sound like a lot, but it’s the highest percentage of healthy residents of all metro areas surveyed for the CDC’s 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, an annual telephone survey measuring a range of health issues. Accordingly, census figures indicate 5.3 percent of Fort Collins-Loveland area commuters walk or bike as their primary form of transportation to work, one of the highest rates in the country.

Five of the top 10 healthiest metro areas in terms of weight were among the 10 regions with highest percentages of residents walking or biking to work in the Governing analysis. Although tallies of walkers and bikers are small compared to all commuters, many who walk or bike to public transit stations aren’t counted in the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey data, and significantly more exercise outdoors outside of their daily commutes.

While only a fraction of workers in an area may opt to bike or walk to work, having the necessary infrastructure in place compels others to use it more regularly.

Spending hours a day in a car or living a sedentary lifestyle makes it difficult to shed pounds. Exercising helps, and eating habits, medical conditions and other factors understandably drive obesity rates as well.

Along with commuting habits, other measures showed statistically significant relationships with healthy weights in the analysis. Healthier metro areas were most closely correlated with the portion of a region’s population holding at least a bachelor’s degree. The Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, Conn. metro area, a wealthy region ranking near the top in education attainment, recorded the lowest obesity rate in the CDC’s 2010 survey.

Still, the correlation between commuting and residents not considered obese nor overweight was strong–16 percent greater than the relationship with median household income.  An area’s average commute time was slightly correlated with weight, but was not statistically significant.
Scatter plot of metro areas’ walkers/bike commuters correlated with healthy weights:

The CDC recommends a range of infrastructure for communities to rein in obesity. Bike lanes, shared-use paths and bike racks promote cycling. Urban design with adequate sidewalks, lighting, street crossings and similar features supports walking and other physical activity. The agency also suggests localities work to cut miles driven on roadways.

American Public Health Association’s Polan cited public transit projects and converting old rail lines into trails as two of the more popular initiatives localities pursue. It’s particularly important, she said, to encourage kids to walk to school and educate them about pedestrian safety at a young age.

Last year, Los Angeles County, Calif., earmarked nearly $16 million in funding for an initiative aimed at curbing obesity, part of which included expanding bike networks and promoting open spaces.

“There are a lot of smaller initiatives that can engage and energize people and make them realize what a difference they can make at the local level,” Polan said.

When cutting expenses, health costs are an easy target. A recent study by two Lehigh University researchers reported obesity-related costs accounted for $190 billion annually in U.S. health expenditures, nearly 21 percent of the country’s total bill.

Advocates often push for related projects in transportation planning, but the amount of weight officials actually give to health concerns varies. While it may be a major consideration in some communities, others focus strictly on economic concerns, Polan said.

John Norquist, president of the Congress for the New Urbanism, said many American cities have taken steps in recent years to promote walking and biking.

To improve walkability, connected street grids – with slower speed limits and no more than two lanes in each direction – are a key component, he said.

Those looking to move can use the popular walkscore.com website to measure how accessible an apartment or home’s various neighborhood amenities are on foot. Norquist, whose group advocates mixed-use and transit-oriented development, cited New York City, San Francisco, Denver and Albuquerque, N.M., as cities making strides in developing walkable communities.

Biking has also accelerated, Norquist said, particularly in Seattle and other older urban environments. “The old downtowns are in great shape for biking,” he said.

Young people’s attitudes toward biking and public transit have shifted, with more seeking alternatives to long car rides, Norquist said. Bicycle manufacturers have joined in the push to remake communities, hiring lobbyists to pressure Washington and support more bike-friendly transportation planning policies.

The emphasis on healthy lifestyles in urban design isn’t new, though. Richard Jackson, a former head of the CDC’s National Center for Environmental Health who has since become one the movement’s most vocal proponents, published an article linking built environments to adverse health effects back in 2001.

Norquist said that the benefits of walking and biking have now become one of the central themes of urbanists’ arguments for urban revival as recreation represents an increasingly key aspect of living downtown.

“It’s really going to be a big factor, because people want to be healthier,” he said. “It’s a very personal thing.”

Click here to view a summary of the methodology and results. Click here to read the full article: http://www.governing.com/news/state/gov-biking-walking-cities-obesity-study.html

Miami Herald Op/Ed: A dead end on transportation

June 11th, 2012 | Posted by UrbanHS in South Florida | Transportation - (Comments Off)

The Miami Herald has recently published an editorial regarding the need for federal support for transportation in the re-authorization bill and how it will affect South Florida. Read on to learn more:

Miami Herald Editorial
OUR OPINION: Congress must not allow transit funding to expire
By The Miami Herald Editorial
HeraldEd@MiamiHerald.com

If you think our roads and bridges are in terrible shape, along with mass transit, you’re right. And it’s altogether possible you ain’t seen nuthin’ yet.

A critical renewal of federal support for transportation is going nowhere fast, with the clock ticking down toward a June 30 expiration date while House and Senate leaders fight over who’s to blame for the partisan gridlock.

For decades, federal legislation has supported the nation’s transportation infrastructure, although at a level that increasingly falls short of the need. The organization representing the nation’s civil engineers says the U.S. road system rates a D-minus as conditions deteriorate “to the point at which Americans spend 4.2 billion hours a year stuck in traffic at a cost of $78.2 billion a year in wasted time and fuel costs — $710 per motorist.” The poor condition of roads adds another $67 billion in repairs and operating costs to the bill.

This affects South Florida in several ways. Annual surveys, like the one by the Texas Transportation Institute, consistently rate congestion on Miami’s roads and streets among the 10 worst in the country. As for mass transit, Congress’ dysfunction jeopardizes about $184 million in funding for Miami-Dade County, the current allocation for trains and buses.

In the past, Congress dealt with the issue by approving transportation bills covering five or six years, which allowed for orderly planning. Since 2009, when the last multi-year extension expired, it’s limped along on at least nine short-term fixes, making the dispute over transportation funding a case study in congressional dysfunction.

The inability to win agreement requires repeated confrontations in Congress over extensions, makes planning impossible and raises the prospect that one day there will indeed be a cutoff.

This time, the Senate is taking the high road. One of its most liberal members, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and one of its most conservative, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Ok., are jointly spearheading an effort to get House members to agree to a bipartisan version passed in the Senate 74-22 that extends funding for two years.

No one calls it a perfect bill. It provides for only a two-year extension, rather than a longer version, hoping that by the time that expires, the bitter division in the House will have dissipated somewhat. (Good luck with that.) But at least it avoids costly and wasteful confrontations, which is why Sen. Inhofe is pressing his House colleagues to go along. “There is a conservative position in this. And that is to have a bill.”

House GOP members have made unacceptable demands. They want to slash funding for Amtrak, stiff-arm environmental-impact analysis of projects, and require approval of the Keystone XL pipeline. The most alarming provision eliminates dedicated funding for mass transit.

For decades, this has come from the federal tax on fuel. By making mass transit dependent instead on uncertain annual appropriations, every metropolitan area in the country could see traffic grind to a halt.

Instead of using the transportation bill as a vehicle for ideological issues, House GOP members should line up with their Senate colleagues. There is a clear need to provide federal funding for all forms of transportation.

In addition, the bill would also provide hundreds of thousands of jobs, particularly in the ailing construction industry, which suffers from 14 percent unemployment. A funding cutoff at this time would be a new low in congressional irresponsibility.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/06/07/2837986/a-dead-end-on-transportation.html#storylink=cpy

The Sustainable Cities Institute at the National League of Cities provides a great overview of Complete Streets. It provides a description of the need for Complete Streets, its benefits, and the efforts needed for Complete Streets to become a reality. Read on below to learn what the Sustainable Cities Insittute had to say. To learn more about the Broward Complete Streets Initiative, click here.

Sustainable Cities Institute Article

Before there were cars, there were streets that accommodated multiple modes of travel. After the advent of automobiles, transportation agencies increasingly built streets only for cars. Because these incomplete streets lack sidewalks, raised medians, covered bus stops, and treatments for the disabled, they offer no relatively safe transportation option aside from driving.

RATIONALE

Residents who must walk, bike, or take transit on an incomplete street are subjected to unnecessarily dangerous conditions. According to Transportation for America, approximately 76,000 people were killed while crossing or walking along a street between 1995 and 2010. Because the alternative is so dangerous or inconvenient, many people drive short distances. This worsens traffic congestion, degrades air quality, and represents a lost opportunity for improving wellness through increased physical activity. Moreover, an aging population requires complete streets that accommodate multiple modes of travel. Given the shortcomings of incomplete streets, many cities and counties (municipalities) have implemented complete streets policies that create safer and more inviting streets for all users.

 EFFORT REQUIRED

The formulation of a complete street policy is dependent on each municipality’s circumstances and the level of effort varies based on how a municipality pursues its complete streets policy. According to the National Complete Streets Coalition, complete streets policies can take the form of:

  • Ordinances or legislation that mandate complete streets
  • Resolutions that encourage municipal staff to accommodate all users in transportation projects
  • Inclusion of complete street principles in design manuals
  • Incorporation of complete streets into comprehensive plans
  • Internal guidance from heads of transportation agencies directing staff to accommodate all users
  • Executive Orders from elected officials that direct the transportation agencies to accommodate all users

Municipalities should train staff on how the new complete streets policy impacts their area. Municipalities should also consider how to engage the community when developing their complete street policy. This engagement process should include an education component whereby elected officials, municipal employees, and residents obtain information from experts on policy development and implementation. Workshops give community participants an opportunity to learn, express concerns, and provide suggestions about their municipality’s proposed complete streets policy. According to the National Complete Streets Coalition, a good complete streets policy should:

  • Include the community’s complete streets rationale and vision
  • Cover pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit passengers of all ages and abilities, as well as vehicles
  • Create interconnected streets that accommodate all modes
  • Have buy-in from or be adopted by all agencies responsible for the municipality’s streets
  • Apply to new construction and retrofits for the entire right-of-way
  • Establish criteria and procedures for exceptions to the complete streets policy
  • Recommend use of best design standards while retaining flexibility to accommodate/complement the context of the community
  • Set performance standards and measurable results
  • Contain an implementation timeline

BENEFITS

Complete streets can provide many benefits to all communities irrespective of size or location including the following identified by the National Complete Streets Coalition:

  • Grow economy and enhance tax base – Transportation options increase access to shops, restaurants, and jobs and raise property values by creating more inviting communities.
  • Improve safety and mobility – Streets designed for multiple modes of transportation are safer for all users and increase mobility by allowing everyone including children, the elderly, and residents with disabilities to travel with the same level of safety and convenience.
  • Improve health – Complete streets promote physical activity and decrease the number of cars on the road thereby improving air quality.
  • Lower transportation costs – Transportation options allow families to spend less of their income on gasoline thereby increasing household savings and/or disposable income.
  • Ease congestion and increasing road capacity – Complete streets reduce short-distance car trips thereby increasing the street’s overall capacity to accommodate more travelers.
  • Decrease overall municipal budget – Complete streets can incorporate green infrastructure features that reduce stormwater runoff and lower overall transit costs by reducing usage of short-distance curb-to-curb transit service.

RISKS

Municipalities can fail to implement their complete streets policy. Therefore the American Planning Association recommends each municipality create an implementation plan that identifies documents and processes that it needs to modify, assigns responsibilities, and names specific documents/processes that the municipality should create as part of its complete streets implementation. Municipalities can overlook potential users at the beginning of a complete streets project. Municipalities can mitigate this risk by crafting questions, steps, checklists, or decision trees for use throughout the planning, scoping, and final design processes to ensure that municipal staff consider all users from the project’s inception. Municipalities should also record their complete streets performance statistics to address any concerns the community might have regarding the efficacy of a complete streets implementation.

ACTION AGENTS

A municipality should craft its complete streets policy with input from all relevant departments including the fire department, planners, and traffic engineers, as well as transit agencies. In some cases, it may be necessary for a municipality to communicate its complete street vision to its state Department of Transportation. A municipality should also engage the broader community, particularly low-income, elderly, and disable residents, to obtain input regarding their needs and to educate the public about the municipality’s efforts to create complete streets.

COSTS

Municipalities should analyze costs of complete streets in the context of the economic and societal impact of incomplete streets. Creating complete streets can save municipalities the costs of performing expensive and sometimes suboptimal multi-modal retrofits of an incomplete street. Complete streets can also lower initial construction and ongoing maintenance costs by requiring less pavement. Some complete street features have no costs (e.g., changing pedestrian signal timing) or limited costs and can tremendously improve the economic and physical health of the community. Even if a complete street design increases the upfront cost of a project, it can reduce the municipality’s total long-term expenditures.

To read the full article, click here: http://www.sustainablecitiesinstitute.org/view/page.basic/class/feature.class/Class_Complete_Streets;jsessionid=A0F8D47FACA4ACC8211B26EE49095F4E

BB FLYER

On June 16, 2011 Better Block Fort Lauderdale is hosting a one-day event that will illustrate how ordinary streets can be transformed into great public spaces. The Better Block event will be located in FATVillage Arts District, on the 500 Block of NW 1st Avenue. Better Block FTL collaborators include Cadence, FAU School of Urban and Regional Planning, FATVillage Arts District, Flagler Village Civic Association, C&I Studios, Urban Matters, and the City of Fort Lauderdale.

“This one day event will bring urban design to life. Visitors will experience first hand how improvements to the street can enhance their social encounters,” said Co-Founder of Cadence and Gage Couch. “We want to show Fort Lauderdale there is creative community that is actively looking for more places downtown to spend their time and set up their businesses.” said Co-Founder of Cadence and Landscape Architect, Rebecca Bradley. The goal of Better Block is to Demonstrate, Educate, and Connect. Through the use of vegetation, reorganized sidewalk space, public art, “pop-up” businesses, and live music, the block will be transformed into a lively, functional urban street.

“Culturally, we seem to have forgotten that city streets are more than conduits for traffic. They are public spaces. Streets are where people meet, interact, and take part in the fabric of city life,” says Eric Dumbaugh, FAU’s Director of Urban and Regional Planning. Better Block originated in Oak Cliff, TX by creators Jason Roberts and Andrew Howard. Now, Fort Lauderdale will join other cities including Dallas, Oklahoma City, and Philadelphia in using tactical urbanism and volunteer support to revitalize a city block.

“Flagler Village Civic Association is excited to support Better Block FTL,” says Venessa Santiago, Civic
Association President. “This project will put Fort Lauderdale on the map with other large cities seeking
grassroots urban revitalization and we are happy to pitch in and show that FVCA’s members are about
action!”

If interested in volunteering time, funds, or resources towards this community event, please email
BetterBlockFtL@cadence-living.com.

To Attend:

Who: FAU School of Urban and Regional Planning, Cadence Living, FAT Village
What: Better Block FTL,
When: Saturday, June 16th @ 10am
Where: FAT Village Arts District
Why: an urban design exhibit where we will bring the streets to life by re-imaging the street.

Also, taking place @ 6pm UrbanMatters CoLab will be presenting
Pecha Kucha Night: Re[en]visioning the block
https://www.facebook.com/PechaKuchaFtL
http://www.pecha-kucha.org/night/fort-lauderdale/

For more information, or to follow/share it:
https://www.facebook.com/BetterBlockFtL
http://betterblock.org/?p=858

Greater Greater Washington reports on a growing need for an intersection between public health and urban planning. Transportation-related  initiatives like Complete Streets and Safe Routes to School are solutions that can make a difference to our health. Read the article below:

Greater Greater Washington Article

Research has linked the growing obesity epidemic to inactivity caused by poor land-use and transportation choices. Transportation and planning professionals are now joining the ranks of public health professionals to find solutions. Across the region, local officials are taking this to heart.

Obesity is a serious problem in the US. When planners shape land-use or transportation options, they’re determining the potential health of the community, because these options affect whether people can choose effective transit or safe walking and bicycle routes.

When the Prince George’s community hosted a screening of the four-part HBO Weight of the Nation documentary series earlier this week, the community highlighted this intersection between public health and transportation planning.

Global Solutions President and CEO Dr. Maya Rockeymore, speaking at a panel after the screening, responded to the stark numbers presented in the film. In Baltimore, residents of the Inner Harbor have a life expectancy of 62 years while residents of North Baltimore have a life expectancy of 82 years. “Context controls choice,” she said. People need access to parks, transit, safe walking and bicycle routes, and full-service grocery stores to even have the choice to be healthy.

Low-income communities and communities of color have higher rates of obesity and chronic disease. The physical neighborhood of the Inner Harbor contributes to the health disparity in life expectancy. While designed as a walkable community, the neighborhood suffers from vacant houses, streets in need of maintenance and lack of destinations to meet basic needs such as a grocery store. When the physical environment deteriorates, safety becomes an additional issue in neighborhoods.

In the United States, 66% of adults are overweight or obese and nearly 20% of children are obese. Being overweight or obese increases the risk of chronic diseases such as hypertension, high cholesterol, type 2 diabetes, and asthma in both adults and children.

Pamela Creekmur, the Acting Health Officer and Director of the Prince George’s County Health Department, explained that Prince George’s obesity and physical inactivity rates are higher than other jurisdictions in the greater Washington region. Though Prince George’s faces a bigger challenge, all the region’s communities have seen a rise in obesity rates, which range between 18 to 34 percent for adults throughout the region.

Part of the cause of this obesity epidemic is physical inactivity. There has been a 300 percent increase in driving to work since 1960. As the documentary explains, in 1969 almost 50 percent of kids walked or biked to school while today only 13 percent of kids do the same.

The lack of exercise by children extends beyond just commuting to and from school. The documentary shows a mom who takes her children to a parking lot because it is the only open space they have to play. This environment isn’t hospitable to the kind of physical activity a good park encourages.

Whether it’s questions of commuting or questions of parks, transportation and planning professionals make decisions that affect travel and open spaces every day. These decisions need to be viewed as public health decisions.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the federal agency charged with health promotion and disease prevention, agrees. It has recognized that transportation policy, street-scale improvements, and access to places suitable for physical activity matter to our health. Among the CDC’s recommendations is to participate in Safe Routes to School initiatives and adopt Complete Streets policies.

The Guide to Community Prevention Services, written by an independent group of public health and prevention professionals appointed by the CDC director, outlines several more environmental and policy approaches to provide opportunities for people to be physically active. These include the connectivity of sidewalks and streets, providing places for physical activity such as trails, and street-scale improvement such as street lighting and traffic calming. Such urban design features have been shown to improve some aspect of physical activity by 35 percent, not to mention the accompanying benefits of reduced crime and stress.

Of course, these improvements do not come overnight. After the screening, an elected official and audience members noted that such changes are not easy. After all, parks do not generate tax dollars.

But that does not mean that our environments must stagnate while our health deteriorates. Local communities can bring about change even when the federal government or state government seems stuck. Port Towns Youth Council President Erick Vargas talked about how his group took matters into their own hands by doing an audit of the streets and reporting the problems.

Prince George’s County is taking action through a partnership of towns within the county. The Port Towns Community Health Partnership has a policy development team focused specifically on the built environment and nutrition policy to improve options for active living and healthy eating.

The group, which includes the towns of Bladensburg, Colmar Manor, Cottage City, and Edmonston, included a community health and wellness section in the Port Towns sector plan with the goals of providing safe places to walk and exercise and access to nutritious foods. The group is following through on sector plan recommendations to formalize a wellness opportunity zone as part of the zoning code. This would include changes in the built environment, access to healthier foods, and improved environmental stewardship.

Across the Potomac, the Fairfax County Health Department established the Partnership for a Healthier Fairfax, a group of community members and organizations concerned with public health. The Partnership created an environment and infrastructure strategic issues team as one of five teams who will make recommendations for improving health in Fairfax County. The first focus is a on local policy. The team is doing a scan of policies, including transportation and land use, that could be modified to promote a healthier and safer physical environment.

In the Washington region, better transportation and planning decisions can improve our health by increasing our access to efficient transit and space to run, bike, and play. We also create a healthier context for our environmentand as Dr. Rockeymore said, context controls choice. Throughout the region, local groups are working to give more of their neighbors the choice to live healthier lives.

Read the full article at: http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/14837/planners-are-the-new-public-health-officials/